Before that, I decided I need some closure in the form of this blogpost (despite my very obscure blog), then maybe I will start studying tonight (or read Persuasion)//
Essentially, from monday, I've watched one movie each day. So, recap:
- Casablanca
- Vertigo
- Moonrise Kingdom
- Maze Runner
And, read this stunner of a book:
- North and South By Elizabeth Gaskell
There are major feels for each and every one of them. really.
Casablanca kind of surprised me, because for the longest time, I thought it was going to be this 3 hour movie about crime and ruthless men? (Echoing gone with the wind, which tbh was extremely annoying at times). Instead, the short 1+ hours went by extremely pleasantly, and it was a much lighter movie than previously expected. The highlight was definitely Dooley Wilson, as Sam, the piano-player in Rick's, who reminded me of louis armstrong with perhaps less of that crazed look. The entire cast was awesome, and all the side characters were intriguing ESPECIALLY Captain Renault, who plays the selfish corrupt captain of police in Casablanca. The love story ensues and this is one love triangle I could actually tolerate and even enjoy (which is a rare feat).
"Here's looking at you, kid"
Vertigo, aha, voted best film of all time (recently). James Stewart is my absolute favourite actor, a stunner. He's the most gentlemanly quirky gangly awkward ksjdlakslkajddajkldaljkdajkl give me one. There's just this way he speaks, that is so charming to me, and I just wish he were still alive. All his movies i've watched so far have quickly shot up to the best movies i've ever watched, and this is no exception. James Stewart singularly held up this movie, though the suspense did not grip me much as i expected, the ending was indeed unexpected.
I really think what draws me to these more classic films is that things are not just spelt out. You are made to recollect the film on your part, such that you really must pay close attention and be IN the film. And the acting was really important then, because they didn't have cgi to rely on back then. and though the effects in vertigo do seem silly now, but were probably a feat just 50 ish years ago.
Back to James Stewart,
just.
argh.
this is It's a Wonderful Life
best
ever.
haha moonrise kingdom next. I initially refused to watch it because the trailer made me think this movie was some child porn or something, and i just refuse to see the innocence of childhood being tainted in any way (be it very real), i can't deal with that. But when it randomly played on FOX movies channel, i guess there was no way i could pass it up. This movie really only interested me in the last half an hour, and there were some real lol moments for me, whilst the first half, which showed these neurotic children just didn't sit well with me (probably because of its reality, yes). The ending was expected for me, but the process AHAHA yeah well this movie was fun and dark at the same time. (i really don't think I should have let my siblings watch this with me, but they watched Grand Budapest Hotel, and I was allowed to watch moulin rouge when I was young, so I'm guessing there is little censorship in the household)(of course i screamed for them to cover their eyes in the weird parts, I'm a good sister).
MAZE RUNNER wheeeheeee what a fun movie. Watched it in the cinema as part of the really fun 24 hours of post-prelims enjoyment (shortlived its ending in a few minutes)(note practically half of the hwach J2 population was there which was awkward and interesting heh heh). Action non-stop, hot (greasy hehehehe) boys galore, what more can a girl ask for (:
As you can see all level-headedness is gone when i go to fangirl mode.
heheheheheheheh
FANGIRL MODE: EXTREME for North & South (a novel which i took a whole 3 days to finish reading, which is probably the second longest time i've taken to finish a novel i truly enjoyed after the hobbit, which was a month-long adventure). What can I say i'm a sucker for victorian romances. A gentleman, no, a true man is impossible to find, a rarity back in the days, and all but extinct now. So i guess all us girls can do is relish in the fantasy and descriptions/portrayal of such.
“I take it that “gentleman” is a term that only describes a person in his relation to others; but when we speak of him as “a man” , we consider him not merely with regard to his fellow men, but in relation to himself, - to life – to time – to eternity. A cast-away lonely as Robinson Crusoe- a prisoner immured in a dungeon for life – nay, even a saint in Patmos, has his endurance, his strength, his faith, best described by being spoken of as “a man”. I am rather weary of this word “ gentlemanly” which seems to me to be often inappropriately used, and often too with such exaggerated distortion of meaning, while the full simplicity of the noun “man”, and the adjective “manly” are unacknowledged.” ― Elizabeth Gaskell, North and South
Seriously I'm so sick of angsty YA romances where the girl is depressed and the guy is some hormonal badboy alpha male (albeit i like em bad boys ahehehehe). But really, I'm so tired of it, dystopian romances also, just stop it. Yes i spent 3 days reading this and there was not a single kissing scene and in the entire book they, what, touched a maximum of 3 times or something. So this book probably spoke to me more intimately because of my own (im not a creep) (and altogether inexistent) love-life. Our Mr. Thornton spends the entire 500 pages with only the memory of margeret's arms around his neck ONCE to fuel his passions.
You see, in this book true love did not need to be displayed through fierce passionate descriptive scenes. and was more slow broiling which, come on, is way more romantic. Just like Casablanca finally let me enjoy a love triangle, North & South again let me enjoy a love that was not but all too apparent from the beginning stages. Romance (novels) is done right when is does not centre singularly on the relationship and its associated trials. I also loved the religious discourse, and refined calculated manner in which they spoke. haha i sometimes we all spoke like that, then we would be more keen to analyse and understand one person aside from their speech. It was definitely hard to decipher the language because of its roundabout and formal manner, and yet, again i enjoyed it so. Because at least i can work my brain whilst reading, and i found myself rereading paragraphs multiple times to fully understand the brevity of those words. (which is very rare for me, and explains why I took so long to read it)
anyways
i'm a sucker for romances like these. So tender and soft (:
“One word more. You look as if you thought it tainted you to beloved by me. You cannot avoid it. Nay, I, if I would, cannotcleanse you from it. But I would not, if I could. I have neverloved any woman before: my life has been too busy, my thoughtstoo much absorbed with other things. Now I love, and will love.But do not be afraid of too much expression on my part.” ― Elizabeth Gaskell, North and South
guess who ate at the sushi bar again today. Double lunch because i also ate at saveur before heading to the sushi bar for seconds.
time to study?
x,
Jeannette